LSSIX vs. NAESX
LSSIX (Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund) and NAESX (Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - LSSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Loomis Sayles Funds, while NAESX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX returned 12.47%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for NAESX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSSIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for NAESX.
Performance
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSSIX achieves a 23.20% return, which is significantly higher than NAESX's 15.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX has outperformed NAESX with an annualized return of 12.47%, while NAESX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.
LSSIX
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 23.20%
- 6M
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
NAESX
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund | 23.20% | 3.57% | 14.94% | 11.92% | -22.93% | 9.91% | 34.15% | 26.59% | 0.18% | 26.85% |
NAESX Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund | 15.36% | 8.71% | 12.83% | 19.35% | -17.71% | 17.60% | 18.92% | 27.22% | -9.44% | 16.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSSIX and NAESX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LSSIX and NAESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSSIX vs. NAESX — Risk / Return Rank
LSSIX
NAESX
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSSIX | NAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.33 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 12.26 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSSIX drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, which is greater than NAESX's maximum drawdown of -59.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSIX and NAESX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSSIX | NAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.41% | -59.77% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -8.98% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.73% | -25.28% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.42% | -28.19% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -41.82% | +3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.45% | -11.81% | -22.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.44% | +0.29% |
Volatility
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX) at 5.29%. This indicates that LSSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSSIX | NAESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 5.29% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 12.24% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 16.64% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 20.77% | +1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 21.63% | +1.18% |
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than NAESX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSSIX vs. NAESX - Dividend Comparison
LSSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than NAESX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.19% | 7.62% | 3.64% | 2.34% | 3.02% | 20.23% | 1.76% | 8.86% | 11.30% | 12.61% | 0.00% | 7.91% |
NAESX Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund | 1.07% | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.41% | 1.12% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 1.53% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSSIX and NAESX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSSIX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to NAESX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSIX dropped -83.41% vs NAESX's -59.77%.
LSSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSSIX and NAESX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer