LSSIX vs. NAESX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LSSIX (Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund) and NAESX (Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - LSSIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Loomis Sayles, while NAESX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX returned 11.64%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for NAESX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LSSIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for NAESX.

Performance

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSIX achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly higher than NAESX's 15.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSIX has outperformed NAESX with an annualized return of 11.64%, while NAESX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.81% annualized return.

LSSIX

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -4.21%
• 6M: 15.35%
• YTD: 20.13%
• 1Y: 27.08%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 11.64%
• ALL TIME*: 7.87%

NAESX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 10.29%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 13.81%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: 10.81%
• ALL TIME*: 9.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NAESX Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund	20.13%	3.57%	14.94%	11.92%	-22.93%	9.91%	34.15%	26.59%	0.18%	26.85%
NAESX Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund	15.36%	8.71%	12.83%	19.35%	-17.71%	17.60%	18.92%	27.22%	-9.44%	16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSIX and NAESX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996	0.92

The correlation between LSSIX and NAESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSSIX vs. NAESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSSIX

LSSIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LSSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LSSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LSSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
LSSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
LSSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

NAESX

NAESX Risk / Return Rank: 64
NAESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NAESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NAESX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
NAESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NAESX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) and Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSSIX	NAESX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.39	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.04	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.54	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	9.32	-0.40

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the NAESX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSIX and NAESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSIX drawdown since its inception was -83.41%, which is greater than NAESX's maximum drawdown of -59.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSIX and NAESX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSSIX	NAESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.41%	-59.77%	-23.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.77%	-8.98%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-25.28%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.42%	-28.19%	-9.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.52%	-41.82%	+3.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.60%	-2.36%	-4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-11.79%	-22.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.46%	+0.55%

Volatility

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund (LSSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund (NAESX) at 3.31%. This indicates that LSSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSSIX	NAESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	3.31%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.36%	11.97%	+3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	16.47%	+3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	20.67%	+1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.77%	21.55%	+1.22%

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than NAESX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSSIX vs. NAESX - Dividend Comparison

LSSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than NAESX's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSSIX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund	6.35%	7.62%	3.64%	2.34%	3.02%	20.23%	1.76%	8.86%	11.30%	12.61%	0.00%	7.91%
NAESX Vanguard Small Cap Index Fund	1.10%	1.22%	1.19%	1.43%	1.41%	1.12%	1.05%	1.27%	1.53%	1.24%	1.39%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSSIX and NAESX in my portfolio?

LSSIX and NAESX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSSIX or NAESX?

LSSIX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to NAESX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSIX dropped -83.41% vs NAESX's -59.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.