LSPX.L vs. I500.L
LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSPX.L returned 15.13%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for I500.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for I500.L.
Performance
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPX.L is traded in GBp, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with LSPX.L at 10.61% and I500.L at 10.61%.
LSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.61% | 9.48% | 27.64% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 30.18% | 7.06% |
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.61% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPX.L and I500.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between LSPX.L and I500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPX.L
I500.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LSPX.L
I500.L
Financial Services
LSPX.L
I500.L
Communication Services
LSPX.L
I500.L
Consumer Cyclical
LSPX.L
I500.L
Healthcare
LSPX.L
I500.L
Industrials
LSPX.L
I500.L
Consumer Defensive
LSPX.L
I500.L
Energy
LSPX.L
I500.L
Utilities
LSPX.L
I500.L
Real Estate
LSPX.L
I500.L
Basic Materials
LSPX.L
I500.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPX.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPX.L
I500.L
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPX.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 4.13 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 15.23 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPX.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.81 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.13 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and I500.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPX.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -20.75% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -7.08% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.10% | -20.75% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | -20.75% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.23% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -3.35% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.92% | +0.08% |
Volatility
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPX.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.59% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 7.12% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 10.40% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 14.21% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 14.30% | +2.75% |
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPX.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.06% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.87% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LSPX.L and I500.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPX.L.
LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.07% for I500.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and I500.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer