LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L
LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from Amundi and BlackRock respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPX.L returned 16.37%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSPX.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPX.L is traded in GBp, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSPX.L having a 10.61% return and CSPX.L slightly higher at 10.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSPX.L having a 16.37% annualized return and CSPX.L not far behind at 16.07%.
LSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.61% | 9.48% | 27.64% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 30.18% | 15.43% | 29.10% | -2.11% | 10.31% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.77% | 9.09% | 27.44% | 20.40% | -9.06% | 30.58% | 14.17% | 25.59% | 0.15% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPX.L and CSPX.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2010 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, LSPX.L and CSPX.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Financial Services
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Communication Services
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Healthcare
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Industrials
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Energy
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Utilities
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Real Estate
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Basic Materials
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPX.L
CSPX.L
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPX.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.44 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 3.95 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 13.49 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPX.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.38 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.97 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPX.L and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPX.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -25.99% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -7.22% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.10% | -21.16% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | -21.16% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | -25.99% | +0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.28% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -3.29% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.13% | -0.13% |
Volatility
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) is 2.58%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that LSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPX.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 3.49% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 8.67% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 11.99% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 15.39% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 16.37% | +0.68% |
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPX.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.06% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.87% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPX.L and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPX.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPX.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPX.L and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer