LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and XSPX.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while XSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L returned 15.44%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for XSPX.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XSPX.L.

Performance

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LSPU.L is traded in USD, while XSPX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSPU.L having a 10.38% return and XSPX.L slightly lower at 10.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSPU.L having a 15.44% annualized return and XSPX.L not far ahead at 15.45%.

LSPU.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 15.44%

XSPX.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 6M: 11.31%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: 22.18%
• 5Y*: 13.84%
• 10Y*: 15.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD	10.38%	17.50%	25.55%	26.94%	-18.54%	29.55%	17.97%	30.76%	-5.29%	21.93%
XSPX.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	10.29%	17.72%	25.31%	26.30%	-18.64%	30.09%	17.42%	31.90%	-5.38%	21.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPU.L and XSPX.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2010	0.83

The correlation between LSPU.L and XSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSPU.L	XSPX.L
Technology	35.6%	35.6%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.8%
Communication Services	11.2%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.5%
Industrials	8.3%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSPU.L

LSPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LSPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LSPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LSPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LSPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XSPX.L

XSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSPU.L	XSPX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.51	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	3.63	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.45	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	3.12	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.72	13.60	+1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPU.L and XSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSPU.L	XSPX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.51	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.89	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	0.96	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.94	-0.06

Drawdowns

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum XSPX.L drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and XSPX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSPU.L	XSPX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-33.51%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.11%	-8.90%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.43%	-19.16%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.18%	-25.11%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.99%	-33.51%	-0.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.54%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-3.74%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.05%	-0.16%

Volatility

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that LSPU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSPU.L	XSPX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	2.55%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	7.97%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	11.06%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	15.62%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	16.08%	+0.20%

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XSPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LSPU.L vs. XSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while XSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD	0.90%	0.99%	1.29%	1.00%	2.05%	1.11%	1.47%	1.64%	1.96%	1.68%	1.96%	2.01%
XSPX.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSPU.L and XSPX.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LSPU.L and XSPX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LSPU.L or XSPX.L?

On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSPU.L or XSPX.L?

LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XSPX.L.

What is the main difference between LSPU.L and XSPX.L?

LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.15% for XSPX.L.