PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and XEWG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while XEWG.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSPU.L returned 22.35%/yr vs 17.23%/yr for XEWG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XEWG.L.

Performance

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LSPU.L is traded in USD, while XEWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XEWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than XEWG.L's 8.49% return.

LSPU.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.18%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.44%

XEWG.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.48%
YTD
8.49%
6M
10.77%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		10.38%17.50%25.55%26.94%-18.54%2.23%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		8.49%19.45%9.80%17.77%-23.26%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPU.L and XEWG.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.79

The correlation between LSPU.L and XEWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LSPU.L
XEWG.L

Technology

35.6%
18.3%

Financial Services

11.8%
14.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
10.9%

Industrials

8.3%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.5%

Energy

3.5%
4.6%

Utilities

2.4%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.1%

Technology

LSPU.L
35.6%
XEWG.L
18.3%

Financial Services

LSPU.L
11.8%
XEWG.L
14.4%

Communication Services

LSPU.L
11.2%
XEWG.L
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPU.L
10.1%
XEWG.L
10.3%

Healthcare

LSPU.L
8.5%
XEWG.L
10.9%

Industrials

LSPU.L
8.3%
XEWG.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

LSPU.L
4.9%
XEWG.L
6.5%

Energy

LSPU.L
3.5%
XEWG.L
4.6%

Utilities

LSPU.L
2.4%
XEWG.L
6.1%

Real Estate

LSPU.L
1.9%
XEWG.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

LSPU.L
1.8%
XEWG.L
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD

Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged

Often compared with LSPU.L:
LSPU.L vs. CSPX.LLSPU.L vs. VUAG.LLSPU.L vs. FXAIXLSPU.L vs. SP5L.LLSPU.L vs. VUAA.DELSPU.L vs. SPYLSPU.L vs. QGRW
Often compared with XEWG.L:
XEWG.L vs. IUMS.LXEWG.L vs. XDEQ.LXEWG.L vs. IDUS.LXEWG.L vs. XDPP.LXEWG.L vs. XS2D.LXEWG.L vs. S5EE.LXEWG.L vs. PQVM.L

Return for Risk

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LSPU.L
LSPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LSPU.LXEWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
1.32

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.53
2.02

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.91

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

6.27

+8.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPU.L and XEWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LSPU.LXEWG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.32

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.28

+0.60

Drawdowns

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum XEWG.L drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and XEWG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LSPU.LXEWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-38.44%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-9.65%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-18.75%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.32%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-11.03%

+7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.95%

-1.06%

Volatility

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 3.13%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LSPU.LXEWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.52%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

9.78%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

13.99%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

21.08%

-5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

21.08%

-4.80%

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XEWG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSPU.L vs. XEWG.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than XEWG.L's 1.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		0.90%0.99%1.29%1.00%2.05%1.11%1.47%1.64%1.96%1.68%1.96%2.01%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged		1.19%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

LSPU.L and XEWG.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.30% for XEWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and XEWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer