LSMSX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
LSMSX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSMSX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | -6.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMSX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return.
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSMSX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSMSX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
LSMSX
EMO
LSMSX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSMSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.07 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | 3.23 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSMSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.91 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 1.25 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.12 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMSX and EMO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSMSX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
LSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
LSMSX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMSX drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMSX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -95.06% | +80.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.21% | -18.81% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.00% | -28.59% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -2.55% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -32.27% | +29.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 6.22% | -4.01% |
Volatility
LSMSX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) is 1.10%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that LSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSMSX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 4.63% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 11.12% | -9.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 21.39% | -15.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 26.78% | -22.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.52% | 41.41% | -36.89% |