LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and UIC2.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while UIC2.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive China Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSMC.DE returned 36.20%/yr vs -8.06%/yr for UIC2.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for UIC2.DE.

Performance

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than UIC2.DE's -6.51% return.

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 64.57%
• 1Y: 130.64%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

UIC2.DE

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: -6.51%
• 6M: -8.96%
• 1Y: 0.73%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: -8.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	20.94%
UIC2.DE UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	-6.51%	25.73%	19.00%	-13.83%	-24.39%	-33.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021	0.34

The correlation between LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

UIC2.DE

UIC2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 10
UIC2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
UIC2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
UIC2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
UIC2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
UIC2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSMC.DE	UIC2.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.27	0.02	+4.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	0.28	+4.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.04	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.37	0.02	+10.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.83	0.04	+32.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the UIC2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSMC.DE	UIC2.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27	0.02	+4.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	-0.21	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	-0.24	+1.06

Drawdowns

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum UIC2.DE drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSMC.DE	UIC2.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.77%	-63.35%	+23.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-30.64%	+18.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.22%	-30.66%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.77%	-63.26%	+23.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-39.60%	+36.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-42.07%	+32.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	18.47%	-14.51%

Volatility

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Solactive China Technology UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIC2.DE) at 10.04%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIC2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSMC.DE	UIC2.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.23%	10.04%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.18%	17.36%	+4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.40%	33.06%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.21%	37.72%	-6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.06%	37.40%	-11.34%

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UIC2.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSMC.DE vs. UIC2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSMC.DE nor UIC2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE in my portfolio?

LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSMC.DE or UIC2.DE?

On fees, LSMC.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSMC.DE or UIC2.DE?

LSMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for UIC2.DE.

What is the main difference between LSMC.DE and UIC2.DE?

LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while UIC2.DE is Technology Equities. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while UIC2.DE tracks Solactive China Technology. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.47% for UIC2.DE.