LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSMC.DE returned 58.88%/yr vs 26.47%/yr for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 62.48% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's -2.63% return.
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 62.48%
- 6M
- 68.29%
- 1Y
- 122.60%
- 3Y*
- 58.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 62.48% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.33% | 7.12% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMC.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between LSMC.DE and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LSMC.DE
4GLD.DE
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSMC.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.21 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.37 | 1.12 | +8.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.27 | 3.41 | +25.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than 4GLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMC.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -36.79% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -21.73% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | -21.73% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -19.44% | +15.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -12.03% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 7.11% | -2.99% |
Volatility
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 6.93%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMC.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 6.93% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.59% | 20.81% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.34% | 23.70% | +7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 16.29% | +16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 14.56% | +17.77% |
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSMC.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSMC.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMC.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer