LSIIX vs. LSGGX
LSIIX (Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y) and LSGGX (Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - LSIIX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Natixis, while LSGGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 5 years, LSIIX returned 0.83%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for LSGGX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSIIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LSGGX.
Performance
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSIIX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than LSGGX's -5.95% return.
LSIIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
LSGGX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- —
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | 0.46% | 5.58% | 2.91% | 7.50% | -11.31% | 0.18% | 11.60% | 9.04% | -0.31% | 6.65% |
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | -5.95% | 16.84% | 23.30% | 36.10% | -25.98% | 5.89% | 35.25% | 30.63% | -6.70% | 31.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSIIX and LSGGX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, LSIIX and LSGGX have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSIIX vs. LSGGX — Risk / Return Rank
LSIIX
LSGGX
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) and Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSIIX | LSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.11 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 0.27 | +3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSIIX drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, smaller than the maximum LSGGX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIIX and LSGGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSIIX | LSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.77% | -37.72% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -21.08% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.45% | -22.21% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.62% | -37.72% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -11.10% | +9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -7.63% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 7.87% | -6.84% |
Volatility
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) is 1.16%, while Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that LSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSIIX | LSGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 6.41% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 14.26% | -11.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 18.14% | -14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 22.11% | -16.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.51% | 20.55% | -16.04% |
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSIIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSIIX vs. LSGGX - Dividend Comparison
LSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than LSGGX's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.77% | 7.38% | 6.15% | 5.74% | 4.78% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | 3.53% | 3.68% | 4.86% | 4.25% | 3.32% | 4.10% | 8.20% | 3.56% | 2.18% | 4.10% | 6.71% | 3.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSIIX and LSGGX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGGX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to LSIIX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIIX dropped -20.77% vs LSGGX's -37.72%.
LSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSIIX and LSGGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer