PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSIGX vs. BCOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSIGX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BCOIX's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LSIGX has outperformed BCOIX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while BCOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.


LSIGX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.13%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.87%

BCOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
0.09%7.15%3.14%8.01%-11.98%0.80%7.18%9.36%-2.08%8.42%
BCOIX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
0.44%7.47%2.54%6.89%-12.86%-1.02%8.80%10.11%-0.52%4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LSIGX and BCOIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.66

The correlation between LSIGX and BCOIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSIGX vs. BCOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSIGX
LSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOIX
BCOIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BCOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSIGXBCOIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.53

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.30

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.20

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.68

6.53

-0.85

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BCOIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSIGX and BCOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSIGXBCOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.53

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.15

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.52

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Drawdowns

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSIGX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, which is greater than BCOIX's maximum drawdown of -18.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIGX and BCOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSIGXBCOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-18.13%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-2.58%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-5.61%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.98%

-18.13%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

-18.13%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.24%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-2.19%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.87%

+0.37%

Volatility

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOIX) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSIGXBCOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.30%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.69%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.72%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.25%

5.64%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

4.67%

+0.01%

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSIGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSIGX vs. BCOIX - Dividend Comparison

LSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than BCOIX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCOIX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
4.35%4.21%4.13%3.58%3.10%2.96%3.51%2.96%3.13%2.83%3.01%2.84%
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
4.72%4.76%4.69%4.06%4.14%5.95%6.24%2.59%3.42%4.27%4.32%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSIGX and BCOIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCOIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to LSIGX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIGX dropped -20.94% vs BCOIX's -18.13%.

LSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSIGX and BCOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer