PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSHAX vs. SSMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHAX achieves a 26.72% return, which is significantly higher than SSMHX's 14.18% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX has outperformed SSMHX with an annualized return of 17.06%, while SSMHX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.


LSHAX

1D
0.86%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
26.72%
6M
19.50%
1Y
0.59%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
17.06%

SSMHX

1D
1.00%
1M
5.71%
YTD
14.18%
6M
13.12%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
26.72%-19.53%82.16%-19.74%39.45%42.75%5.23%31.30%-8.18%15.65%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
14.18%12.90%10.73%25.21%-25.43%13.08%32.46%28.00%-9.21%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHAX and SSMHX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between LSHAX and SSMHX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSHAX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSHAX
LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SSMHX
SSMHX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SSMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SSMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSHAXSSMHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.32

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

3.18

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

11.56

-11.42

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SSMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHAX and SSMHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSHAXSSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

1.89

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.29

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Drawdowns

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHAX drawdown since its inception was -69.03%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHAX and SSMHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSHAXSSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.03%

-41.61%

-27.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

-10.03%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.79%

-30.38%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.79%

-34.84%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.78%

-41.61%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.74%

0.00%

-28.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-9.15%

-12.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.18%

2.76%

+11.42%

Volatility

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) at 4.70%. This indicates that LSHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSHAXSSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

4.70%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.96%

12.36%

+17.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.15%

16.90%

+20.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.19%

22.41%

+11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.66%

22.39%

+8.27%

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHAX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSHAX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison

LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than SSMHX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
9.15%11.59%4.66%9.40%1.76%0.11%0.53%0.00%4.85%3.94%1.84%0.00%
SSMHX
State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio
6.24%7.12%0.00%1.56%2.31%16.30%2.91%3.65%6.43%4.01%1.71%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSHAX and SSMHX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSHAX has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to SSMHX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHAX dropped -69.03% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.

SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSHAX and SSMHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer