LSHAX vs. ETILX
LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) and ETILX (Eventide Gilead Class I) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX returned 16.86%/yr vs 15.03%/yr for ETILX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSHAX charges 1.68%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for ETILX.
Performance
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSHAX achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than ETILX's 18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX has outperformed ETILX with an annualized return of 16.86%, while ETILX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.03% annualized return.
LSHAX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.86%
ETILX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 22.50% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
ETILX Eventide Gilead Class I | 18.02% | 23.77% | -0.03% | 22.76% | -34.03% | 11.44% | 55.44% | 34.11% | -2.35% | 33.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSHAX and ETILX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2010 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LSHAX and ETILX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSHAX vs. ETILX — Risk / Return Rank
LSHAX
ETILX
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSHAX | ETILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.69 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 10.67 | -10.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSHAX drawdown since its inception was -69.03%, which is greater than ETILX's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHAX and ETILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSHAX | ETILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.03% | -41.30% | -27.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.39% | -14.40% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.79% | -25.71% | -20.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.79% | -41.30% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.78% | -41.30% | -9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.11% | 0.00% | -31.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -11.48% | -10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.55% | 3.63% | +9.92% |
Volatility
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Volatility Comparison
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) at 6.81%. This indicates that LSHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSHAX | ETILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.66% | 6.81% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.07% | 15.32% | +14.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.43% | 18.75% | +19.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 24.36% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.82% | 23.49% | +7.33% |
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSHAX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ETILX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSHAX vs. ETILX - Dividend Comparison
LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, less than ETILX's 10.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETILX Eventide Gilead Class I | 10.23% | 12.07% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 5.36% | 6.30% | 0.79% | 3.14% | 5.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.13% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 9.46% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSHAX and ETILX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSHAX has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to ETILX (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHAX dropped -69.03% vs ETILX's -41.30%.
ETILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSHAX and ETILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer