LSHAX vs. EEOFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) and EEOFX (Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LSHAX returned 11.73%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for EEOFX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSHAX charges 1.68%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for EEOFX.

Performance

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHAX achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly lower than EEOFX's 26.50% return.

LSHAX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -9.69%
• YTD: 22.50%
• 6M: 18.86%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: 27.08%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: 16.86%

EEOFX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 26.50%
• 6M: 23.74%
• 1Y: 50.87%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	22.50%	-19.53%	82.16%	-19.74%	39.45%	42.75%	5.23%	31.30%	-8.18%	3.65%
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	26.50%	23.55%	1.32%	-1.53%	-27.88%	10.83%	62.80%	25.43%	-15.79%	3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHAX and EEOFX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2017	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between LSHAX and EEOFX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LSHAX vs. EEOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSHAX

LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EEOFX

EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSHAX	EEOFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	2.23	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	2.94	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.36	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	3.93	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	12.15	-12.08

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the EEOFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHAX and EEOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHAX drawdown since its inception was -69.03%, which is greater than EEOFX's maximum drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHAX and EEOFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSHAX	EEOFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.03%	-50.17%	-18.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.39%	-13.49%	-14.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.79%	-31.32%	-14.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.79%	-50.17%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.11%	-3.90%	-27.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.95%	-19.57%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.55%	4.34%	+9.21%

Volatility

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) at 10.55%. This indicates that LSHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSHAX	EEOFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.66%	10.55%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.07%	18.56%	+11.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	23.77%	+14.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.42%	25.23%	+9.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.82%	24.88%	+5.94%

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHAX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EEOFX's 2.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSHAX vs. EEOFX - Dividend Comparison

LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than EEOFX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	0.05%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	6.63%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	9.46%	11.59%	4.66%	9.40%	1.76%	0.11%	0.53%	0.00%	4.85%	3.94%	1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSHAX and EEOFX in my portfolio?

LSHAX and EEOFX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSHAX or EEOFX?

LSHAX has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to EEOFX (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHAX dropped -69.03% vs EEOFX's -50.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.