LSHAX vs. BMDSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) and BMDSX (Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX returned 17.42%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for BMDSX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LSHAX charges 1.68%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for BMDSX.

Performance

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHAX achieves a 32.50% return, which is significantly higher than BMDSX's 7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHAX has outperformed BMDSX with an annualized return of 17.42%, while BMDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.

LSHAX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -2.20%
• 6M: 12.03%
• YTD: 32.50%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: 17.42%
• ALL TIME*: 8.46%

BMDSX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.68%
• 6M: 4.81%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 1Y: -0.79%
• 3Y*: -0.95%
• 5Y*: -2.59%
• 10Y*: 8.65%
• ALL TIME*: 7.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	32.50%	-19.53%	82.16%	-19.74%	39.45%	42.75%	5.23%	31.30%	-8.18%	15.65%
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund	7.10%	-9.55%	-1.16%	19.91%	-27.86%	21.81%	34.56%	35.94%	-1.52%	26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHAX and BMDSX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between LSHAX and BMDSX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LSHAX vs. BMDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSHAX

LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

BMDSX

BMDSX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BMDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BMDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BMDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BMDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BMDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSHAX	BMDSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.22	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	-0.21	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.98	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	-0.26	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	-0.60	+2.03

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the BMDSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHAX and BMDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHAX drawdown since its inception was -69.03%, which is greater than BMDSX's maximum drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHAX and BMDSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSHAX	BMDSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.03%	-53.96%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.39%	-13.32%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.79%	-25.04%	-20.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.79%	-36.24%	-9.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.78%	-36.24%	-14.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.49%	-20.32%	-5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.96%	-11.00%	-10.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.03%	6.84%	+6.19%

Volatility

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) at 3.29%. This indicates that LSHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSHAX	BMDSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.73%	3.29%	+5.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.05%	11.90%	+18.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.97%	15.52%	+23.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.59%	21.07%	+13.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.98%	20.76%	+10.22%

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHAX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BMDSX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSHAX vs. BMDSX - Dividend Comparison

LSHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, less than BMDSX's 12.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMDSX Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund	12.96%	13.88%	4.57%	2.44%	1.79%	17.82%	10.09%	5.77%	6.62%	4.87%	0.00%	0.15%
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund	8.75%	11.59%	4.66%	9.40%	1.76%	0.11%	0.53%	0.00%	4.85%	3.94%	1.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSHAX and BMDSX in my portfolio?

LSHAX and BMDSX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSHAX or BMDSX?

LSHAX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to BMDSX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHAX dropped -69.03% vs BMDSX's -53.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.