LSGRX vs. NEFOX
LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and NEFOX (Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund) are both mutual funds - LSGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while NEFOX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX returned 15.08%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for NEFOX. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LSGRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NEFOX.
Performance
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than NEFOX's 6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has outperformed NEFOX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while NEFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.84% annualized return.
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
NEFOX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 14.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -6.38% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund | 6.49% | 14.77% | 15.71% | 30.96% | -13.02% | 33.94% | 13.08% | 26.76% | -13.01% | 20.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGRX and NEFOX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 1991 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LSGRX and NEFOX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGRX vs. NEFOX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGRX
NEFOX
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSGRX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.26 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 5.63 | -5.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NEFOX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and NEFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGRX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -62.35% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -7.07% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.33% | -17.25% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -23.56% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.69% | -41.01% | +6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.51% | -0.46% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -12.45% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 2.71% | +3.62% |
Volatility
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX) at 4.73%. This indicates that LSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGRX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 4.73% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 10.37% | +3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 14.19% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 19.19% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 20.76% | +0.22% |
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NEFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGRX vs. NEFOX - Dividend Comparison
LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than NEFOX's 9.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.37% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund | 9.52% | 7.14% | 6.85% | 3.62% | 17.00% | 7.02% | 9.21% | 9.34% | 10.83% | 4.19% | 3.66% | 4.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGRX and NEFOX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGRX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to NEFOX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGRX dropped -63.63% vs NEFOX's -62.35%.
NEFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGRX and NEFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer