LSGRX vs. MEIFX
LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and MEIFX (Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX returned 15.08%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for MEIFX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LSGRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for MEIFX.
Performance
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than MEIFX's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has outperformed MEIFX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while MEIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.76% annualized return.
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
MEIFX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 8.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -6.38% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 7.49% | 6.51% | 13.19% | 18.96% | -16.43% | 15.15% | 26.18% | 44.95% | -0.51% | 27.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGRX and MEIFX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2005 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LSGRX and MEIFX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGRX vs. MEIFX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGRX
MEIFX
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSGRX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.14 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.67 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 5.16 | -5.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than MEIFX's maximum drawdown of -54.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and MEIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGRX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -54.37% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -4.80% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.33% | -19.30% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -23.54% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.69% | -28.67% | -6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.51% | 0.00% | -9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -7.67% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 1.55% | +4.78% |
Volatility
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX) at 3.35%. This indicates that LSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGRX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 3.35% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 7.43% | +6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 9.96% | +8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 15.99% | +6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 17.95% | +3.03% |
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIFX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGRX vs. MEIFX - Dividend Comparison
LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than MEIFX's 6.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.37% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 6.74% | 7.25% | 14.61% | 0.61% | 9.28% | 25.44% | 13.26% | 40.49% | 11.67% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 4.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGRX and MEIFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGRX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to MEIFX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGRX dropped -63.63% vs MEIFX's -54.37%.
MEIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGRX and MEIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer