LSGRX vs. LSFYX
LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and LSFYX (Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LSGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while LSFYX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX returned 15.08%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for LSFYX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LSGRX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for LSFYX.
Performance
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than LSFYX's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has outperformed LSFYX with an annualized return of 15.08%, while LSFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
LSFYX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -6.38% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
LSFYX Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund | 1.79% | 4.80% | 8.60% | 9.78% | -5.52% | 4.88% | 1.47% | 5.43% | 0.40% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGRX and LSFYX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGRX vs. LSFYX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGRX
LSFYX
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSGRX | LSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.58 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 8.42 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than LSFYX's maximum drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and LSFYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGRX | LSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -20.67% | -42.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -1.51% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.33% | -2.95% | -24.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -7.60% | -27.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.69% | -20.67% | -14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.51% | -0.13% | -9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -1.13% | -16.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 0.43% | +5.90% |
Volatility
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) at 0.31%. This indicates that LSGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGRX | LSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 0.31% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.82% | 1.85% | +11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 2.78% | +15.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 3.01% | +19.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 3.49% | +17.49% |
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than LSFYX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGRX vs. LSFYX - Dividend Comparison
LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than LSFYX's 7.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFYX Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund | 7.24% | 7.09% | 9.23% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 3.87% | 5.18% | 6.46% | 6.07% | 5.67% | 5.89% | 6.23% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.37% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGRX and LSFYX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGRX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to LSFYX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGRX dropped -63.63% vs LSFYX's -20.67%.
LSFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGRX and LSFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer