LSGBX vs. TPINX
LSGBX (Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund) and TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LSGBX returned 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TPINX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSGBX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for TPINX.
Performance
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGBX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than TPINX's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGBX has outperformed TPINX with an annualized return of 0.79%, while TPINX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.20% annualized return.
LSGBX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
TPINX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 0.20%
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | -0.26% | 8.52% | -2.46% | 5.48% | -17.18% | -4.94% | 13.49% | 7.52% | -2.49% | 8.87% |
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund | 1.28% | 15.02% | -11.95% | 2.45% | -6.17% | -5.06% | -4.41% | 0.63% | 1.26% | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGBX and TPINX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 1991 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, LSGBX and TPINX have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGBX vs. TPINX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGBX
TPINX
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 2.65 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGBX drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, roughly equal to the maximum TPINX drawdown of -26.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGBX and TPINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -26.45% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -6.36% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.42% | -13.03% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -18.19% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.86% | -26.45% | -0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.57% | -13.78% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -4.85% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 2.06% | -0.54% |
Volatility
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) is 1.44%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that LSGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGBX | TPINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | 2.11% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.90% | 6.11% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.55% | 7.36% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 8.15% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 7.26% | -1.46% |
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than TPINX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGBX vs. TPINX - Dividend Comparison
LSGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than TPINX's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.31% | 4.94% | 1.75% | 0.66% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund | 5.07% | 4.29% | 5.77% | 3.87% | 5.17% | 5.38% | 4.59% | 6.12% | 6.53% | 3.34% | 2.33% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGBX and TPINX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPINX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to LSGBX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGBX dropped -26.86% vs TPINX's -26.45%.
TPINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGBX and TPINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer