PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSFYX vs. SFHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSFYX having a 1.31% return and SFHIX slightly higher at 1.36%. Over the past 10 years, LSFYX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.06% annualized return.


LSFYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
4.15%

SFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.17%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
26.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
1.31%4.80%8.60%9.78%-5.52%4.88%1.47%5.43%0.40%5.06%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.36%5.70%8.14%11.50%-0.95%3.90%1.77%588.11%0.53%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between LSFYX and SFHIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between LSFYX and SFHIX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSFYX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSFYX
LSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SFHIX
SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSFYXSFHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.99

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

4.82

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.90

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.20

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.48

7.79

+2.69

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the SFHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSFYX and SFHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSFYXSFHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.99

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

2.70

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

0.56

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.52

+1.02

Drawdowns

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSFYX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SFHIX drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFYX and SFHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSFYXSFHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-19.94%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-2.25%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-2.25%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.60%

-5.57%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.67%

-19.94%

-0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-0.83%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.63%

-0.03%

Volatility

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that LSFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSFYXSFHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.46%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

1.43%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

1.65%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

2.00%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

46.69%

-43.20%

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSFYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSFYX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison

LSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, less than SFHIX's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
7.27%7.09%9.23%6.81%5.17%3.87%5.18%6.46%6.07%5.67%5.89%6.23%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.61%7.61%8.07%8.06%4.99%3.20%3.93%142.83%5.03%4.00%4.22%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSFYX and SFHIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSFYX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to SFHIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSFYX dropped -20.67% vs SFHIX's -19.94%.

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSFYX and SFHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer