PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSEQ vs. SIHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEQ achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly higher than SIHY's 1.75% return.


LSEQ

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.81%
YTD
27.26%
6M
27.35%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIHY

1D
0.01%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.15%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
27.26%4.13%12.80%-1.20%
SIHY
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
1.75%8.13%8.67%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LSEQ and SIHY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023

0.20

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSEQ
SIHY

Basic Materials

27.3%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

17.3%
13.9%

Energy

15.0%
11.9%

Healthcare

14.7%
1.5%

Communication Services

7.0%
3.0%

Industrials

6.5%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
2.0%

Utilities

3.1%
3.0%

Financial Services

1.2%
6.3%

Real Estate

-

5.3%

Technology

-10.9%
8.8%

Basic Materials

LSEQ
27.3%
SIHY
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LSEQ
17.3%
SIHY
13.9%

Energy

LSEQ
15.0%
SIHY
11.9%

Healthcare

LSEQ
14.7%
SIHY
1.5%

Communication Services

LSEQ
7.0%
SIHY
3.0%

Industrials

LSEQ
6.5%
SIHY
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

LSEQ
5.2%
SIHY
2.0%

Utilities

LSEQ
3.1%
SIHY
3.0%

Financial Services

LSEQ
1.2%
SIHY
6.3%

Real Estate

LSEQ

-

SIHY
5.3%

Technology

LSEQ
-10.9%
SIHY
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. SIHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SIHY
SIHY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SIHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SIHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSEQSIHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.60

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

10.75

-0.98

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SIHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEQ and SIHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSEQSIHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.98

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.64

+0.55

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum SIHY drawdown of -13.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and SIHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSEQSIHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-13.30%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-3.17%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-0.12%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-2.78%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.76%

+1.95%

Volatility

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) at 1.16%. This indicates that LSEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSEQSIHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

1.16%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

3.09%

+9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

4.17%

+10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

7.57%

+6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

7.57%

+6.74%

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SIHY's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSEQ vs. SIHY - Dividend Comparison

LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than SIHY's 7.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
1.73%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIHY
Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF
7.26%7.61%7.54%7.06%6.31%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSEQ and SIHY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SIHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEQ dropped -8.35% vs SIHY's -13.30%.

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 25.53% vs 8.21% for SIHY. On fees, SIHY is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SIHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIHY is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

SIHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 1.73% for LSEQ.

LSEQ is categorized as Long-Short, while SIHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.70% for LSEQ and 0.48% for SIHY.

SIHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSEQ and SIHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer