LSEQ vs. BFLX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) and BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LSEQ charges 1.70%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BFLX.

Performance

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LSEQ

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: -4.11%
• 6M: 7.53%
• YTD: 19.52%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.07%

BFLX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	$5.91M	$46.74M	$33.84M
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	$52.67K	$50.40K	$61.03K

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	-2.88%
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LSEQ and BFLX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026	0.50

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSEQ	BFLX
Technology	21.2%	29.0%
Healthcare	17.4%	7.4%
Basic Materials	15.0%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	13.6%
Industrials	9.8%	14.8%
Communication Services	9.3%	6.7%
Energy	6.8%	2.6%
Utilities	4.3%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	3.8%
Financial Services	0.6%	13.7%
Real Estate	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. BFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BFLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSEQ	BFLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	—	—

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than BFLX's maximum drawdown of -4.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and BFLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSEQ	BFLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-4.55%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-1.02%	-7.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-1.65%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSEQ	BFLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.34%	14.64%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	14.64%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	14.64%	+0.37%

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BFLX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSEQ vs. BFLX - Dividend Comparison

LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	1.84%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSEQ and BFLX in my portfolio?

LSEQ and BFLX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSEQ or BFLX?

On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSEQ or BFLX?

BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSEQ or BFLX?

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.

What is the main difference between LSEQ and BFLX?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.70% for LSEQ and 0.40% for BFLX.