PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSEIX vs. WALSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) and Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEIX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than WALSX's 13.20% return.


LSEIX

1D
0.53%
1M
1.65%
6M
6.94%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
7.55%
ALL TIME*
6.34%

WALSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.58%
6M
8.01%
YTD
13.20%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LSEIX
Persimmon Long/Short Fund
10.15%12.02%17.36%15.70%-9.95%7.02%
WALSX
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund
13.20%-12.79%7.24%27.75%-8.38%12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LSEIX and WALSX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between LSEIX and WALSX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSEIX vs. WALSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSEIX
LSEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
LSEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

WALSX
WALSX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WALSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WALSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WALSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WALSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
WALSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) and Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSEIXWALSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

0.69

+3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.38

1.40

+16.98

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the WALSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEIX and WALSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEIX drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum WALSX drawdown of -25.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEIX and WALSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSEIXWALSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-25.28%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-10.76%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-25.28%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.08%

+13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-9.71%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

5.31%

-4.33%

Volatility

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) is 1.98%, while Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund (WALSX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that LSEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WALSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSEIXWALSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

4.98%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.69%

12.35%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

16.26%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

16.38%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

16.38%

-5.69%

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEIX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WALSX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSEIX vs. WALSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSEIX nor WALSX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSEIX
Persimmon Long/Short Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.23%3.49%6.18%0.00%4.88%
WALSX
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSEIX and WALSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WALSX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to LSEIX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEIX dropped -19.92% vs WALSX's -25.28%.

LSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSEIX and WALSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer