PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSEIX vs. MNWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEIX achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than MNWIX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LSEIX has outperformed MNWIX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while MNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.82% annualized return.


LSEIX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.37%
YTD
6.52%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
7.11%

MNWIX

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.44%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSEIX
Persimmon Long/Short Fund
6.52%12.02%17.36%15.70%-9.95%14.67%8.13%5.28%-6.10%13.39%
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
0.83%7.71%6.42%5.41%-2.15%1.35%3.11%8.70%2.10%6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LSEIX and MNWIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.53

Over the past year, LSEIX and MNWIX have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSEIX vs. MNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEIX
LSEIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LSEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MNWIX
MNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSEIXMNWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.12

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

0.64

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.65

2.55

+18.10

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the MNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEIX and MNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSEIXMNWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.64

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.99

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.00

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.86

-0.23

Drawdowns

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEIX drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than MNWIX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEIX and MNWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSEIXMNWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-5.57%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-5.57%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-5.57%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.63%

-5.57%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.92%

-5.57%

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.67%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-1.13%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.39%

-0.39%

Volatility

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Persimmon Long/Short Fund (LSEIX) is 0.87%, while MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that LSEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSEIXMNWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

1.47%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

4.42%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

5.56%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

3.98%

+6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

3.84%

+6.82%

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEIX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MNWIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSEIX vs. MNWIX - Dividend Comparison

LSEIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSEIX
Persimmon Long/Short Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.23%3.49%6.18%0.00%4.88%
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
0.75%0.76%1.13%0.78%0.70%0.13%0.24%0.54%0.42%0.94%2.65%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSEIX and MNWIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNWIX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to LSEIX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEIX dropped -19.92% vs MNWIX's -5.57%.

LSEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSEIX and MNWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer