LSAF vs. OPTZ
LSAF (LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - LSAF tracks the AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index while OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LSAF returned 25.54% vs 68.17% for OPTZ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSAF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.
Performance
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSAF achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 36.96% return.
LSAF
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 25.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- —
OPTZ
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 36.96%
- 6M
- 34.58%
- 1Y
- 68.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 13.78% | 12.01% | 10.75% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 36.96% | 22.83% | 16.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAF and OPTZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between LSAF and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSAF
OPTZ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
LSAF
OPTZ
Technology
LSAF
OPTZ
Financial Services
LSAF
OPTZ
Industrials
LSAF
OPTZ
Healthcare
LSAF
OPTZ
Consumer Defensive
LSAF
OPTZ
Energy
LSAF
OPTZ
Basic Materials
LSAF
OPTZ
Real Estate
LSAF
OPTZ
Communication Services
LSAF
OPTZ
Utilities
LSAF
OPTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSAF vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank
LSAF
OPTZ
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSAF | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.58 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 6.45 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 28.40 | -15.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAF drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAF and OPTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSAF | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.67% | -25.75% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.58% | -10.63% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | 0.00% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -3.36% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.41% | -0.41% |
Volatility
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) is 3.54%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that LSAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSAF | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 9.04% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 15.69% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 19.62% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 21.18% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 21.18% | +0.66% |
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSAF vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison
LSAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than OPTZ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAF LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.69% | 0.42% | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.71% | 0.20% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSAF and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPTZ has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to LSAF (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSAF dropped -41.67% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.
On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 68.17% vs 25.54% for LSAF. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LSAF has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 68.17% return vs 25.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.
LSAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.43% for OPTZ.
LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index, while OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LSAF and 0.25% for OPTZ.
OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSAF and OPTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer