LRND vs. DMAY
LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LRND tracks the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LRND returned 23.71%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRND charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
LRND vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRND achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
LRND
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 7.42%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 34.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
LRND vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 11.98% | 20.31% | 21.68% | 44.13% | -19.33% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRND and DMAY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LRND and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
LRND vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRND
DMAY
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRND
DMAY
Communication Services
LRND
DMAY
Healthcare
LRND
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
LRND
DMAY
Industrials
LRND
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
LRND
DMAY
Basic Materials
LRND
DMAY
Financial Services
LRND
DMAY
Energy
LRND
-
DMAY
Real Estate
LRND
-
DMAY
Utilities
LRND
-
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRND vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
LRND
DMAY
LRND vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRND | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.73 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 22.76 | -12.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRND | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.65 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.88 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
LRND vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRND | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -13.90% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -3.36% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -12.38% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.30% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -2.24% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 0.55% | +2.91% |
Volatility
LRND vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRND | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 0.84% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 3.74% | +8.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 4.73% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 9.02% | +10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 8.43% | +11.56% |
LRND vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRND vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.97% | 1.22% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRND and DMAY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRND has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 23.71% vs 11.96% for DMAY. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
LRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRND and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer