LRN vs. IRM
LRN (Stride, Inc.) and IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) are both stocks. LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while IRM operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, LRN returned 23.80%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for IRM. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRN vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 54.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LRN has outperformed IRM with an annualized return of 23.80%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.08% annualized return.
LRN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- -31.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
IRM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 54.64%
- 6M
- 55.51%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 35.74%
- 5Y*
- 27.45%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
LRN vs. IRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 50.49% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 54.64% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRN and IRM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.20 |
The correlation between LRN and IRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRN:
$4.65B
IRM:
$38.02B
LRN:
$9.68
IRM:
$0.91
LRN:
10.10
IRM:
139.08
LRN:
1.86
IRM:
5.23
LRN:
$2.54B
IRM:
$7.25B
LRN:
$972.24M
IRM:
$2.94B
LRN:
$424.60M
IRM:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRN vs. IRM — Risk / Return Rank
LRN
IRM
LRN vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRN | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.18 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.14 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 2.73 | -3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRN vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and IRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRN | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.41% | -55.71% | -25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.07% | -25.15% | -38.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.07% | -39.03% | -25.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.07% | -39.03% | -25.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.07% | -39.03% | -25.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.46% | -3.65% | -38.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -13.16% | -23.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.11% | 10.47% | +31.64% |
Volatility
LRN vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) have volatilities of 8.21% and 7.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRN | IRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 7.91% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.17% | 24.13% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.70% | 32.04% | +34.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 29.68% | +21.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 29.64% | +19.58% |
Dividends
LRN vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.59% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LRN vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRN vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
IRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
IRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 395.23M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
IRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 143.67M and revenue of 1.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRN and IRM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to IRM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs IRM's -55.71%.
IRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRN and IRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer