PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRN vs. DUOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRN vs. DUOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly higher than DUOL's -30.13% return.


LRN

1D
-1.77%
1M
10.87%
YTD
50.49%
6M
51.49%
1Y
-31.17%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
26.27%
10Y*
23.80%

DUOL

1D
-0.98%
1M
16.81%
YTD
-30.13%
6M
-37.52%
1Y
-74.53%
3Y*
-8.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRN vs. DUOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LRN
Stride, Inc.
50.49%-37.53%75.05%89.80%-6.15%13.83%
DUOL
Duolingo, Inc.
-30.13%-45.87%42.93%218.92%-32.97%-24.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LRN and DUOL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

EPS

LRN:

$9.68

DUOL:

$11.67

PE Ratio

LRN:

10.10

DUOL:

10.51

PEG Ratio

LRN:

0.25

DUOL:

0.03

PS Ratio

LRN:

1.86

DUOL:

4.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRN:

$2.54B

DUOL:

$1.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRN:

$972.24M

DUOL:

$798.46M

EBITDA (TTM)

LRN:

$424.60M

DUOL:

$167.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRN vs. DUOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRN
LRN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DUOL
DUOL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DUOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUOL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DUOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRN vs. DUOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRNDUOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.72

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.92

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

-1.26

+0.52

LRN vs. DUOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the DUOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRN and DUOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRN vs. DUOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, roughly equal to the maximum DUOL drawdown of -83.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and DUOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNDUOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.41%

-83.35%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.07%

-81.19%

+17.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.07%

-83.35%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.46%

-77.32%

+34.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-35.76%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.11%

59.48%

-17.37%

Volatility

LRN vs. DUOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stride, Inc. (LRN) is 8.21%, while Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that LRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNDUOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

15.67%

-7.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

40.94%

-16.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.70%

62.97%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

66.21%

-14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.22%

66.21%

-16.99%

Dividends

LRN vs. DUOL - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRN nor DUOL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LRN vs. DUOL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Duolingo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
629.87M
291.97M
(LRN) Total Revenue
(DUOL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LRN vs. DUOL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stride, Inc. and Duolingo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
73.0%
Portfolio components
LRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

DUOL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 213.10M and revenue of 291.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

LRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

DUOL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported an operating income of 44.53M and revenue of 291.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

LRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.

DUOL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Duolingo, Inc. reported a net income of 43.46M and revenue of 291.97M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRN and DUOL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUOL has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to LRN (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs DUOL's -83.35%.

LRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRN and DUOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer