PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRN vs. 2318.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LRN is traded in USD, while 2318.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2318.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly higher than 2318.HK's -9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, LRN has outperformed 2318.HK with an annualized return of 23.80%, while 2318.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 9.74% annualized return.


LRN

1D
-1.77%
1M
10.53%
YTD
50.49%
6M
51.49%
1Y
-31.79%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
26.27%
10Y*
23.80%

2318.HK

1D
0.54%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
-9.86%
6M
-7.85%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
-1.30%
10Y*
9.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LRN
Stride, Inc.
50.49%-37.53%75.05%89.80%-6.15%56.99%4.32%-17.91%55.91%-7.34%
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
-9.86%49.16%40.39%-27.79%-2.46%-38.92%6.71%37.21%-14.14%112.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LRN and 2318.HK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.06

The correlation between LRN and 2318.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRN vs. 2318.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRN
LRN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

2318.HK
2318.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
2318.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2318.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
2318.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
2318.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
2318.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Ping An Insurance (2318.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRN2318.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.17

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.13

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

2.66

-3.40

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the 2318.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRN and 2318.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, roughly equal to the maximum 2318.HK drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and 2318.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRN2318.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.41%

-78.94%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.07%

-21.86%

-42.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.07%

-46.01%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.07%

-57.80%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.07%

-66.79%

+2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.46%

-25.16%

-17.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-32.12%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.11%

9.23%

+32.88%

Volatility

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Volatility Comparison

Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) at 3.57%. This indicates that LRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2318.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRN2318.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

3.57%

+4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

22.36%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.70%

28.64%

+38.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

40.61%

+10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.22%

33.24%

+15.98%

Dividends

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Dividend Comparison

LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2318.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
5.34%4.30%5.80%7.68%5.55%4.86%2.44%2.30%1.38%1.50%1.67%1.24%
LRN
Stride, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LRN vs. 2318.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Ping An Insurance. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LRN values in USD, 2318.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


LRN and 2318.HK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRN and 2318.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer