LRCU vs. NTSD
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
LRCU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRCU
- 1D
- -18.44%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 254.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 136.88% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and NTSD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -5.58% | -34.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -2.97% | -15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -1.09% | -8.16% |
Volatility
LRCU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.41% | 25.11% | +91.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 25.11% | +91.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.41% | 25.11% | +91.30% |
LRCU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
LRCU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer