PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. JOBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. JOBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF (JOBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly higher than JOBX's -38.47% return.


LRCU

1D
11.16%
1M
63.66%
YTD
216.82%
6M
265.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JOBX

1D
-2.19%
1M
53.57%
YTD
-38.47%
6M
-45.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. JOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
216.82%140.01%
JOBX
Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF
-38.47%-26.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and JOBX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. JOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Tradr 2X Long JOBY Daily ETF (JOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRCU vs. JOBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCUJOBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.83

-0.45

+13.28

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. JOBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum JOBX drawdown of -88.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and JOBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUJOBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-88.29%

+48.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-76.54%

+76.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-58.98%

+49.55%

Volatility

LRCU vs. JOBX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUJOBXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.64%

146.86%

-37.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.64%

146.86%

-37.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.64%

146.86%

-37.22%

LRCU vs. JOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LRCU and JOBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

LRCU vs. JOBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor JOBX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and JOBX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRCU and JOBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

LRCU and JOBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and JOBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer