LRCU vs. IYZ
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while IYZ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. LRCU is actively managed, while IYZ is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYZ.
Performance
LRCU vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 314.98% return, which is significantly higher than IYZ's 28.55% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 12.70%
- 1M
- 77.20%
- YTD
- 314.98%
- 6M
- 346.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYZ
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 28.55%
- 6M
- 31.94%
- 1Y
- 57.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.71%
LRCU vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 314.98% | 172.36% |
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 28.55% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and IYZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IYZ
LRCU vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and IYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -77.11% | +37.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.52% | +5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -40.09% | +30.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | IYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.38% | 18.64% | +95.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.38% | 18.89% | +95.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.38% | 19.31% | +95.07% |
LRCU vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 1.91% | 2.04% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.15% | 3.54% | 2.27% | 1.98% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and IYZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IYZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IYZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IYZ is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.42% for IYZ.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and IYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer