LRCU vs. IBIF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. LRCU is actively managed, while IBIF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIF.

Performance

LRCU vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly higher than IBIF's 1.13% return.

LRCU

• 1D: -18.44%
• 1M: 38.68%
• YTD: 270.56%
• 6M: 254.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIF

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	270.56%	172.36%
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	1.13%	1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and IBIF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIF

IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 63
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRCU	IBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.95	—

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than IBIF's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and IBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	IBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-2.50%	-37.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.44%	-0.88%	-17.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-0.55%	-8.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	IBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	116.41%	2.07%	+114.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.41%	3.54%	+112.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.41%	3.54%	+112.87%

LRCU vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	3.77%	4.51%	4.05%	0.96%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and IBIF in my portfolio?

LRCU and IBIF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or IBIF?

On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or IBIF?

IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or IBIF?

IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between LRCU and IBIF?

LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.10% for IBIF.