PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. GEVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 216.82% return, which is significantly higher than GEVG's 92.20% return.


LRCU

1D
11.16%
1M
63.66%
YTD
216.82%
6M
265.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GEVG

1D
3.97%
1M
-18.84%
YTD
92.20%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
216.82%8.18%
GEVG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF
92.20%-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and GEVG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRCU vs. GEVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRCUGEVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.83

2.35

+10.48

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and GEVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUGEVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-33.81%

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.18%

+31.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-9.05%

-0.38%

Volatility

LRCU vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUGEVGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.64%

96.95%

+12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.64%

96.95%

+12.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.64%

96.95%

+12.69%

LRCU vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRCU vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and GEVG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

LRCU and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for GEVG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and GEVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer