LRCU vs. EWY
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. LRCU is actively managed, while EWY is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
LRCU vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 268.21% return, which is significantly higher than EWY's 103.10% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 57.23%
- YTD
- 268.21%
- 6M
- 315.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
LRCU vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 268.21% | 172.36% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 36.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and EWY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWY
LRCU vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.59 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -74.14% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.88% | +8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -20.11% | +10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.97% | 46.51% | +67.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 30.15% | +83.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 28.06% | +85.91% |
LRCU vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and EWY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.59% for EWY.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer