LRCU vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 314.98% return, which is significantly higher than EMEQ's 78.37% return.

LRCU

• 1D: 12.70%
• 1M: 77.20%
• YTD: 314.98%
• 6M: 346.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: 4.84%
• 1M: 15.54%
• YTD: 78.37%
• 6M: 90.73%
• 1Y: 153.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	314.98%	172.36%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	78.37%	32.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and EMEQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRCU	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.33	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.66	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	32.09	—

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-19.99%	-20.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.12%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-4.04%	-5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	32.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.38%	35.77%	+78.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.38%	32.02%	+82.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.38%	32.02%	+82.36%

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.55%	2.76%	0.84%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and EMEQ in my portfolio?

LRCU and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or EMEQ?

On fees, EMEQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or EMEQ?

EMEQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or EMEQ?

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between LRCU and EMEQ?

LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EMEQ is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.86% for EMEQ.