LRCU vs. DOGG
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
LRCU vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 159.30% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 10.97% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- -8.27%
- 1M
- -30.48%
- 6M
- 64.39%
- YTD
- 159.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 159.30% | 172.36% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 10.97% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and DOGG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOGG
LRCU vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.71% | -11.19% | -36.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.71% | -2.46% | -45.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -3.27% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.57% | 11.28% | +112.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.57% | 13.05% | +110.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.57% | 13.05% | +110.52% |
LRCU vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.52% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and DOGG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for DOGG.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer