LRCU vs. CMGG
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.
Performance
LRCU vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -34.81% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- YTD
- 270.56%
- 6M
- 245.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -34.81%
- 6M
- -37.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCU vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 270.56% | 29.65% |
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -34.81% | 36.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and CMGG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum CMGG drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and CMGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | CMGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -56.75% | +16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -45.94% | +27.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -23.52% | +14.23% |
Volatility
LRCU vs. CMGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | CMGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.15% | 68.93% | +47.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.15% | 68.93% | +47.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.15% | 68.93% | +47.22% |
LRCU vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LRCU nor CMGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and CMGG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
LRCU and CMGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for CMGG.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and CMGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer