LRCU vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.

Performance

LRCU vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 270.56% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 778.97% return.

LRCU

• 1D: -18.44%
• 1M: 38.68%
• YTD: 270.56%
• 6M: 254.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: 10.53%
• 1M: 20.45%
• YTD: 778.97%
• 6M: 676.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	270.56%	7.61%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	778.97%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and BEG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

LRCU vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCU	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.09%	-59.85%	+19.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.44%	0.00%	-18.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-16.76%	+7.51%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRCU	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	116.41%	212.53%	-96.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.41%	212.53%	-96.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.41%	212.53%	-96.12%

LRCU vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRCU vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LRCU nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCU and BEG in my portfolio?

LRCU and BEG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRCU or BEG?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRCU or BEG?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRCU or BEG?

LRCU and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LRCU and BEG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.75% for BEG.