LQTI vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

LQTI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQTI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.31%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

LQTI vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQTI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQTI	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQTI	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

LQTI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQTI	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	0.00%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	0.00%	-1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	0.00%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LQTI	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.10%	0.00%	+5.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	0.00%	+5.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.97%	0.00%	+5.97%

LQTI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQTI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LQTI or IPDP?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQTI or IPDP?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQTI or IPDP?

LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.11%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between LQTI and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 1.52% for IPDP.