LQTI vs. HIGH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LQTI returned 5.55% vs -3.55% for HIGH. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for HIGH.

Performance

LQTI vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.56% return.

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIGH

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: -0.56%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: -3.55%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQTI vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	6.69%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	-0.56%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LQTI and HIGH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

LQTI vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

HIGH

HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQTI vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQTI	HIGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	-0.40	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	-0.52	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.93	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	-0.38	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	-0.54	+5.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQTI vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQTI and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQTI	HIGH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	-0.40	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.38	+0.56

Drawdowns

LQTI vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and HIGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQTI	HIGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-9.50%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.41%	-9.50%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-7.29%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-2.38%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	6.54%	-5.43%

Volatility

LQTI vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.24%. This indicates that LQTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQTI	HIGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	1.24%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.04%	3.51%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	8.82%	-3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	9.56%	-3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.97%	9.56%	-3.59%

LQTI vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HIGH's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQTI vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, more than HIGH's 7.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	7.34%	7.71%	8.34%	9.40%	0.62%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQTI and HIGH in my portfolio?

LQTI and HIGH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQTI or HIGH?

LQTI has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to HIGH (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQTI dropped -3.41% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

Which ETF is better, LQTI or HIGH?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 5.55% vs -3.55% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LQTI or HIGH?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 5.55% return vs -3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQTI or HIGH?

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQTI or HIGH?

LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 7.34% for HIGH.

What is the main difference between LQTI and HIGH?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 0.51% for HIGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.