LQDI vs. ICPI
LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and ICPI (iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares. LQDI is actively managed, while ICPI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. LQDI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ICPI.
Performance
LQDI vs. ICPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than ICPI's 2.70% return.
LQDI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ICPI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDI vs. ICPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.72% | 0.72% |
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.70% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDI and ICPI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDI vs. ICPI — Risk / Return Rank
LQDI
ICPI
LQDI vs. ICPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDI | ICPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDI | ICPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 6.20 | -5.80 |
Drawdowns
LQDI vs. ICPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, which is greater than ICPI's maximum drawdown of -0.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and ICPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDI | ICPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.99% | -0.22% | -28.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -0.03% | -5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
LQDI vs. ICPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDI | ICPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 0.95% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 0.95% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 0.95% | +9.89% |
LQDI vs. ICPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than ICPI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDI vs. ICPI - Dividend Comparison
LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than ICPI's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.80% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDI and ICPI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICPI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICPI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for LQDI.
LQDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.
Their fees differ too: 0.18% for LQDI and 0.09% for ICPI.
Find the right allocation for LQDI and ICPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer