LQDI vs. IBIC
LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares. LQDI is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, LQDI returned 7.30% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
LQDI vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.
LQDI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDI vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.72% | 8.84% | 1.48% | 5.75% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDI and IBIC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.35 |
The correlation between LQDI and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDI vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
LQDI
IBIC
LQDI vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDI | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.24 | -0.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 17.27 | -14.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 67.45 | -59.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDI | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 5.05 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 3.49 | -3.09 |
Drawdowns
LQDI vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDI | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.99% | -0.90% | -28.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -0.26% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.13% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -0.10% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.07% | +0.88% |
Volatility
LQDI vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that LQDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDI | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 0.33% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | 0.67% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 0.90% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 1.58% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 1.58% | +9.26% |
LQDI vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDI vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDI and IBIC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDI has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDI dropped -28.99% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, LQDI leads with 7.30% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQDI has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for LQDI.
LQDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
Their fees differ too: 0.18% for LQDI and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDI and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer