PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-0.93%8.09%1.06%9.14%-17.80%-2.04%10.98%17.87%-3.94%6.81%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
10.91%64.92%26.14%13.44%-0.09%-4.03%24.16%18.28%-1.31%11.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDE.L achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than IGLN.L's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDE.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 2.60%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.


LQDE.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
2.60%

IGLN.L

1D
3.60%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
10.91%
6M
23.69%
1Y
52.73%
3Y*
34.04%
5Y*
22.41%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDE.L
LQDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.00

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

2.48

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

3.03

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.65

11.51

-7.86

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDE.L and IGLN.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.00

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

1.31

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.94

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.49

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between LQDE.L and IGLN.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

LQDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
5.00%4.89%5.02%4.58%3.74%2.68%2.77%3.42%3.69%3.25%3.40%3.36%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDE.L drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -45.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDE.L and IGLN.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-45.24%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.72%

-17.36%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-21.15%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.38%

-21.15%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-9.80%

+4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-19.88%

+15.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

4.58%

-3.33%

Volatility

LQDE.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) is 2.31%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that LQDE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQDE.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

11.63%

-9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.80%

22.21%

-18.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.98%

26.25%

-19.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.40%

17.06%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.64%

15.41%

-6.77%