PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDB vs. SHYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQDB vs. SHYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDB achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than SHYG's 1.44% return.


LQDB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*

SHYG

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
5.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDB vs. SHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LQDB
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
0.77%7.50%2.37%9.60%-15.51%2.35%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.44%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDB and SHYG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.60

The correlation between LQDB and SHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDB vs. SHYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDB
LQDB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LQDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDB vs. SHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDBSHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.73

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

16.23

-9.29

LQDB vs. SHYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SHYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDB and SHYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDBSHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.07

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.85

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.73

-0.58

Drawdowns

LQDB vs. SHYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDB drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than SHYG's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDB and SHYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDBSHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-19.26%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-1.75%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.90%

-4.53%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-9.39%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.24%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-1.44%

-6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.40%

+0.46%

Volatility

LQDB vs. SHYG - Volatility Comparison

iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) at 0.94%. This indicates that LQDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDBSHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.94%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

2.51%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

3.16%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

5.73%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.85%

6.42%

+0.43%

LQDB vs. SHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LQDB vs. SHYG - Dividend Comparison

LQDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than SHYG's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDB
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
4.70%4.65%4.46%3.90%4.14%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.02%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


LQDB and SHYG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQDB has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to SHYG (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDB dropped -21.63% vs SHYG's -19.26%.

On 5-year performance, SHYG leads with 4.83% vs 0.84% for LQDB. On fees, LQDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHYG has performed better with a 4.83% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LQDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SHYG.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 4.70% for LQDB.

LQDB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SHYG is High Yield Bonds. LQDB tracks iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade BBB 0+ Index , while SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQDB and 0.30% for SHYG.

SHYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDB and SHYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer