LQDB vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LQDB (iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. LQDB is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. LQDB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

LQDB vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LQDB

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 0.84%
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDB vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LQDB iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF	-0.13%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

LQDB vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDB

LQDB Risk / Return Rank: 43
LQDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LQDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
LQDB Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LQDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQDB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDB vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQDB	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQDB	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	—	—

Drawdowns

LQDB vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDB drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDB and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQDB	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	0.00%	-21.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	0.00%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.93%	0.00%	-7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LQDB	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07%	0.00%	+4.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	0.00%	+6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	0.00%	+6.85%

LQDB vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQDB vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

LQDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LQDB iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF	4.70%	4.65%	4.46%	3.90%	4.14%	1.32%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LQDB or QCON?

On fees, LQDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQDB or QCON?

LQDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQDB or QCON?

LQDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between LQDB and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQDB and 0.32% for QCON.