LQDB vs. GABF

In the year-to-date period, LQDB achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -0.67% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LQDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LQDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the GABF Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDB and GABF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LQDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than GABF's 4.22% yield.

The maximum LQDB drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, roughly equal to the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDB and GABF.

The current volatility for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) is 1.55%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that LQDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.