LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L
LQDA.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQDA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQDA.L returned -0.01%/yr vs 24.18%/yr for IUIT.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return.
LQDA.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 13.14%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- 22.75%
- 1Y
- 51.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.42%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.33%
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.02% | 8.01% | 1.25% | 8.99% | -17.75% | -1.66% | 10.56% | 18.22% | -4.30% | 4.45% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.04% | 22.93% | 38.51% | 59.45% | -29.15% | 34.09% | 43.14% | 48.90% | -1.41% | 25.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA.L and IUIT.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between LQDA.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA.L
IUIT.L
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.03 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 8.99 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.55 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 1.02 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.16 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -33.46% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -17.03% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.86% | -26.40% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -33.46% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -3.14% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -6.02% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 5.76% | -4.56% |
Volatility
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) is 2.23%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that LQDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 7.49% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 15.53% | -11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 20.28% | -14.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 23.61% | -15.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 22.47% | -13.36% |
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDA.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LQDA.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDA.L.
LQDA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. LQDA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LQDA.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for LQDA.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer