PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPTH vs. BE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPTH vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPTH achieves a 37.13% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 298.03% return.


LPTH

1D
-2.24%
1M
-12.63%
YTD
37.13%
6M
73.62%
1Y
380.84%
3Y*
123.87%
5Y*
40.97%
10Y*
24.10%

BE

1D
5.15%
1M
14.33%
YTD
298.03%
6M
274.86%
1Y
1,490.11%
3Y*
181.89%
5Y*
65.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPTH vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LPTH
LightPath Technologies, Inc.
37.13%205.95%180.16%3.28%-50.00%-37.76%440.69%-51.34%-39.43%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
298.03%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%-23.48%283.67%-25.15%-46.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LPTH and BE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.24

The correlation between LPTH and BE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LPTH:

$868.30M

BE:

$110.57B

EPS

LPTH:

-$85.64K

BE:

$0.02

PS Ratio

LPTH:

0.00

BE:

37.10

PB Ratio

LPTH:

0.00

BE:

119.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPTH:

$19.15T

BE:

$2.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPTH:

$6.96T

BE:

$761.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

LPTH:

-$4.25T

BE:

$88.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPTH vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPTH
LPTH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LPTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPTH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LPTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPTH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPTH vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPTHBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.69

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.47

32.82

-23.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.64

101.70

-80.06

LPTH vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPTH Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 13.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPTH and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPTH vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPTH drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than BE's maximum drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPTH and BE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPTHBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.65%

-92.54%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.52%

-45.94%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.08%

-53.42%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.66%

-75.87%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.32%

0.00%

-77.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-51.79%

-34.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.70%

14.80%

+2.90%

Volatility

LPTH vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) has a higher volatility of 35.11% compared to Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) at 28.47%. This indicates that LPTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPTHBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.11%

28.47%

+6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.56%

73.68%

+8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.39%

108.51%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.10%

86.29%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.64%

95.74%

-16.10%

Dividends

LPTH vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LPTH nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LPTH vs. BE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LightPath Technologies, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00T10.00T15.00T20.00T20222023202420252026
19.15T
751.05M
(LPTH) Total Revenue
(BE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LPTH vs. BE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LightPath Technologies, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.3%
30.0%
Portfolio components
LPTH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.96T and revenue of 19.15T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

LPTH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.25T and revenue of 19.15T, resulting in an operating margin of -22.2%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

LPTH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LightPath Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -4.11T and revenue of 19.15T, resulting in a net margin of -21.4%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LPTH and BE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPTH has higher volatility (35.11%) compared to BE (28.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPTH dropped -99.65% vs BE's -92.54%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.92 vs 3.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPTH and BE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer