LPCPX vs. WFSPX
LPCPX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund Investor C) and WFSPX (iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K) are both mutual funds - LPCPX is a Target Retirement Date fund tracking the BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Custom Benchmark (USD), while WFSPX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LPCPX returned 10.26%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for WFSPX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LPCPX charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for WFSPX.
Performance
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPCPX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LPCPX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.
LPCPX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
WFSPX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.68%
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPCPX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund Investor C | 11.75% | 18.89% | 5.29% | 21.07% | -19.52% | 14.84% | 13.56% | 25.12% | -9.16% | 21.51% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 9.77% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPCPX and WFSPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between LPCPX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPCPX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
LPCPX
WFSPX
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund Investor C (LPCPX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPCPX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.01 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.01 | 13.58 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPCPX drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPCPX and WFSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPCPX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -58.21% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -8.90% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | -18.74% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -24.51% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | -33.74% | -0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.72% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -12.76% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.97% | +0.27% |
Volatility
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund Investor C (LPCPX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) at 4.67%. This indicates that LPCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPCPX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 4.67% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 9.83% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 12.49% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.97% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 18.07% | -1.61% |
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPCPX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LPCPX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
LPCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than WFSPX's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPCPX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund Investor C | 4.61% | 5.15% | 1.93% | 2.08% | 2.06% | 14.52% | 1.36% | 5.32% | 14.74% | 5.04% | 1.06% | 8.27% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K | 1.59% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LPCPX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LPCPX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to WFSPX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPCPX dropped -34.60% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.
WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPCPX and WFSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer