PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPCIX vs. LCTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetLife Core Plus Fund (LPCIX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPCIX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LPCIX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 1.74%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.84% annualized return.


LPCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.23%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.74%

LCTRX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPCIX
MetLife Core Plus Fund
0.47%7.16%1.27%5.52%-14.24%-0.99%7.58%9.56%-0.64%4.87%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.87%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LPCIX and LCTRX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.13

Over the past year, LPCIX and LCTRX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPCIX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPCIX
LPCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LPCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LPCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife Core Plus Fund (LPCIX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPCIXLCTRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.60

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

5.58

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.95

-0.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

4.22

-2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.19

17.54

-11.35

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the LCTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPCIX and LCTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPCIXLCTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.60

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

2.23

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.77

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.70

-0.32

Drawdowns

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPCIX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPCIX and LCTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPCIXLCTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-26.09%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-1.17%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.29%

-1.33%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-3.82%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.98%

-23.93%

+4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

0.00%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-4.12%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.28%

+0.63%

Volatility

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison

MetLife Core Plus Fund (LPCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.58%. This indicates that LPCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPCIXLCTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.58%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

1.43%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

1.91%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.44%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

6.31%

-1.38%

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPCIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPCIX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison

LPCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than LCTRX's 5.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.27%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%
LPCIX
MetLife Core Plus Fund
4.20%4.12%3.43%3.95%2.58%1.52%2.48%5.87%2.73%2.63%2.66%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


LPCIX and LCTRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPCIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to LCTRX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPCIX dropped -18.98% vs LCTRX's -26.09%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPCIX and LCTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer